(Case Caption) |
September 9, 1988 |
OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS
FOR:
1) A PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE PLAINTIFF;
2) PHYSICAL EXAMINATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE MINOR
CHILD;
3) REQUIRING ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF ALL INTERVIEWS OF THE MINOR CHILD;
4) PROHIBITING THE MOTHER AND HER AGENTS FROM INTERROGATING THE MINOR
CHILD;
5) REQUIRING THE FILING OF UCCJA AFFIDAVITS.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
In the context of divorce and custody disputes, sixty to eighty percent
of accusations of sexual abuse of a child by a parent are false or
unsubstantiated. See Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting and
Investigation: Policy Guidelines for Decision Making, published
by ABA National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection,
October 8, 1987, and Wakefield and Underwager, Accusations of Child
Sexual Abuse, published by C.C. Thomas. A study of the
increasingly frequent phenomena of allegations of sexual abuse in the
context of divorce has led researchers to observe that the psychological
profile of the accusing parent can be particularly useful in evaluating
the likely truth or falsity of the accusations. See Blush and Ross,
Sexual Allegations in Divorce, the SAID Syndrome, 1987, Conciliation
Courts Review, 25. Blush and Ross, supra, find the
child's alleged statements the least significant aspect of evaluating the
situation. Underwager and Wakefield, supra, suggest that it
is most important to assess the adult interactions with the alleged victim
as part of the evaluation process.
The real issue in this case is the level, nature, extent, and effect of
adult social influence upon the minor child in encouraging or producing
the statements the mother alleges the child made to her. In
particular, given the context in which plaintiff has raised these
allegations, particular attention must be focused on her psychological
make-up, psychological needs, hidden agendas, and her influence on the
child in his making the statements alleged.
The purpose of the various motions filed by defendant is to minimize
the trauma to defendant's son as a result of these false accusations by
limiting interrogation of the child to qualified court-appointed
professionals and minimizing the need for repetition of those events
through comprehensive audiotaping and videotaping. The defendant is
seeking to afford protection to his son from the trauma associated with
the legal process, and to satisfy the court that Steven will not be at
risk in defendant's custody, due to the presence of various
supervisors. In addition, the defendant is seeking to have the court
order the various evaluations and disclosure on an expedited basis, and
set a date for a full hearing of the issues not later than November 30,
1988.
It is well known that uncertainty is difficult for children to deal
with. The Connecticut Bar Association's Guidelines for Courts and
Counsel in custody cases states, with respect to counsel for children:
"... counsel should act to move the proceedings
toward conclusion as speedily as possible, since undue delay in the
resolution of the custody or visitation dispute is rarely in the best
interest of the child. The minor will suffer more than any of the
adults as a consequence of the anxiety of uncertainty. Counsel
should keep in mind that cases can be expedited not only by moving for
early trial dates but also by facilitating the completion of the various
evaluations and investigations." 56 Conn. Bar Journal 484, 492
(1982).
The Court should do no less.
During the litigation, Steven's life of, necessity, is going to be
somewhat uncertain. However, to minimize both the intensity and the
duration of that time, it is requested that Steven be permitted to reside
with his father, as he has for the past year and a half, pursuant to a
stipulation and order voluntarily entered into by the mother in early 1987
which gave sole custody of Steven to his father. This way, Steven
will be able to attend school and continue his normal activities and
relationships in a manner that will be least disruptive to his life.
Uprooting Steven at this time, having him move to a new town and enter
school there, only to have him ultimately returned to his father in the
middle of the school year, would not be in Steven's best interest where he
is adequately protected from the alleged danger of the defendant, and from
the harm that would be caused were he to reside with his mother, who is of
questionable emotional stability.
1) MOTION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE PLAINTIFF
The defendant categorically denies the allegations of sexual abuse made
by the plaintiff in her affidavit for an ex parte change of custody.
Assuming, for the sake of argument, that the child made the statements
alleged in plaintiff's affidavit, the issue for the court is: "why
did the child make those statements?" Research has demonstrated
that a principal reason in the context of divorce and custody disputes may
be found in the psychological functioning of the accusing adult and adult
agendas which impose ideas upon children, making those children the
unwitting pawns and victims of those adults.
By raising the issue of abuse, plaintiff has put the psychological
functioning of the entire family at issue in this case. Thus, it is
totally appropriate that her psychological status and functioning be
evaluated to determine the effect that they have had upon the situation,
and upon Steven allegedly having made the statements reported in
plaintiff's affidavit. If the plaintiff is confident of the validity
of her statements, and is honest in the reason for making the allegations
in the time and manner which she did, she will have absolutely no
reluctance to undergoing whatever psychiatric or psychological evaluation
the court orders. The court certainly should be skeptical of the
veracity of her allegations should plaintiff be reluctant to submit to
such evaluations.
2) MOTION FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE
MINOR CHILD
If it has not already been performed, a physical examination of the
minor child by his customary pediatrician should be performed immediately
to determine if any physical evidence of sexual abuse exists. This
examination can be performed in an innocuous fashion. The child can be
told he is going for a routine physical examination. No statements should
be made to the pediatrician indicating that the issue involves an
allegation of sexual abuse of the child by the husband. Any competent
pediatrician doing a thorough job will make a complete head to toe
examination of the child, including an examination of his genitals, and
will report any physical findings he may make. Such an examination is not
inherently harmful to Steven. It is in his interest as much as anyone
else's that the existence or absence of physical signs of abuse be
investigated and reported promptly.
3) MOTION SEEKING AUDIOTAPING AND VIDEOTAPING OF ALL ADULT INVESTIGATIVE
CONTACTS OF THE MINOR CHILD
Cases involving allegations of sexual abuse of a child, when the
allegations are made by one parent against another parent, customarily
deteriorate into a series of interviews of the minor child and attempts by
the plaintiff to introduce hearsay statements into evidence. Usually the
hearsay statements are reformulations by the party offering them in a
manner which enhances their value to that party. The defense against these
statements is to question the circumstances under which they were made,
the manner in which the interrogation was conducted and the competency, if
any, of the "professionals" conducting such interviews. The result can be lengthy and confusing
testimony before the court which legitimately results in the court being
confused and having a difficult time determining the validity, if any, of
anything that has been offered in evidence.
One sure way to avoid this quagmire is to have each and every adult
investigative contact with the minor child audiotaped at a minimum, and if
possible, videotaped. As any parent knows, and certainly any educator of
children knows, children can be taught to say various things which may or
may not be true. The teaching can be direct, or subtle through
reinforcement by body motions, facial signs, or other visual cues. If a
videotape recording is made of any interview between the child and the
interviewer concerning the topic of sexual abuse, at the very least there
will be no question as to what actually took place. Thus, at the time of
trial, the court will only have to deal with the issues of the validity
and weight to be accorded such evidence, if found to be admissible. Audiotaping and/or videotaping of all investigative contacts with the
minor child will minimize the number of times the child must be
interviewed concerning a delicate subject, and will eliminate totally
arguments about the accuracy of reporting of the child's statements.
4) MOTION PROHIBITING THE MOTHER AND HER AGENTS FROM INTERROGATING THE
MINOR CHILD CONCERNING THE ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE
As noted above, the child can be taught to say various things,
depending upon the cues received from the questioner. Wakefield and
Underwager, supra, have written extensively on "Interrogation as a
Learning Process." This is true just as much of what the mother says
and how she behaves in relation to the child on a daily basis as it does
to specific professionals, law enforcement personnel or others
interrogating the child concerning the allegations. Where, as here, it
appears that the mother is serving her own needs by raising the
allegations in the time and manner she has, rather than being truly
concerned about the psychological and emotional needs of her son, Steven,
it is appropriate that the court prohibit the mother, and her family
members and friends, or anyone else, from discussing with the child the
allegations of abuse other than in the context of a court appointed
interview or evaluation which is audio- or videotaped. Should the mother
claim that the child raises the topic of abuse on his own and that she has
an obligation as a parent to respond to that, the mother can very
unobtrusively acknowledge the statements made by her son and simply
suggest that it would be more appropriate to discuss the matter at another
time, in the presence of the court-appointed professionals. This will give
the child assurance that his concerns, if they really are his, are being
met by the mother, but again will minimize the extent to which the mother
conditions or brain washes her son into making accusations against his
father.
Defendant agrees to be bound by the same restraints concerning
discussion of the topic of abuse with Steven.
5) MOTION REQUIRING THE FILING OF UCCJA AFFIDAVITS
The UCCJA, Connecticut General Statutes Section 46(b)-99, requires the
filing by all parties of affidavits concerning the residence and custody
of the minor child at the commencement of custody proceedings. The filing
of this affidavit is not discretionary with the court. The defendant is
requesting an order that these affidavits be filed since this statute, as
a routine matter, seems to be honored in its breach.
Here, the father has had custody of the minor child pursuant to
stipulation and order since early 1987. In the context of allegations and
abuse, there is national recognition that frequently one party absconds
with the child and secretes the child in another state, thus depriving
both the child and the accused of ever litigating the issues and
preventing the court from ever making a determination as to the best
interests of the child. See, "Mothers on the Run", U.S. News
& World Report dated June 13, 1988. The obvious purpose of the UCCJA,
and the Federal Parental Kidnapping Act, is to limit the extent to which a
parent may be successful in fleeing one jurisdiction and instituting legal
proceedings in another. As a precaution, and pursuant to statutory
mandate, the Court should require all parties to file UCCJA statements,
forthwith.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, and at oral argument, it is
respectfully requested that the various motions of the defendant be
granted in their entirety.
THE DEFENDANT
by _____________________
His Attorney