Case # 3
Mark and Janice Butler had been married seven years
and had two daughters,
Jessica, age 5 and Andrea, age 3 when they separated
following an increasingly
acrimonious and conflicted marriage. Mark moved into
an apartment while Janice had
temporary custody of the children. At the time of the
divorce several months later, the
couple entered into an agreement regarding child custody
and visitation which
provided for joint custody, primary residence with Janice,
and liberal visitations with
Mark.
For a time, things went fairly well although the relationship
between the couple
remained acrimonious and difficult. Nevertheless, Mark
visited his children regularly.
However, when Mark began dating Susan, an investment
banker whom he met at a
professional singles club, Janice's anger toward Mark
increased. She began finding
reasons for not allowing the children to go on the scheduled
visits. She noticed (as
had Mark) an increase in crying, fussing, and clinging
following the visits and after one
visit in which Susan had been present, she filed charges
of drinking and physical
abuse of the children. Mark then filed contempt charges
against Janice for her actions
in severely limiting his visitation. The next month,
the judge ordered unsupervised
visits and also ordered an evaluation of all parties.
As the evaluation was being completed, Janice called
child protection, claiming the
younger girl, Andrea, had said her father was abusing
her. She said the children were
now having nightmares following visits with their father,
that Andrea's genitals were
red and sore, and that Andrea had tried to touch her
sister's genitals in the bathtub.
Janice then began to question the girls about whether
their father had touched them in
their genitals and Andrea agreed that her father had
"hurt her bottom."
The girls were put into therapy with a therapist who
immediately concluded that the
girls were sexually abused based on the history provided
by Janice. After several
sessions of therapy in which the children were encouraged
to talk about abuse and
reenact the abuse in play, allegations were made by
Jessica as well as by Andrea.
The girls were interviewed by a child protection worker
and a policemen. The tape of
this interview was made after the children had been
talked to previously by Janice, the
therapist, and the child protection worker.
Mark stoutly denied the sexual abuse and attributed
the allegations to the conflicts
over visitations and Janice's jealousy of his relationship
with Susan. He
acknowledged that he had touched the children's genitals
in the process of bathing
and toilet training.
Psychological testing and clinical interviews indicated
that Mark was intelligent,
stable, and responsible with good coping skills and
with no indication of difficulties
with impulse control, antisocial behavior, or acting
out. The evaluation of Janice
indicated that she was intelligent and capable but oversensitive,
resentful, overreactive, and most likely had a paranoid personality
disorder. No conclusions
were drawn in the evaluations concerning the veracity
of the abuse charges.
The initial allegations were that Mark had spanked the
girls and had touched their
"bottoms" with his finger. However, as the
therapy sessions progressed, the
allegations grew into accounts of highly deviant behaviors
including bondage and
pornography. Mark was said to put the girls on special
chain-up boards, which he had
made for each of them. He allegedly brought these boards
to Susan's house and kept
extra boards under his desk at his office. He chained
them to the boards and spanked
them and anally and vaginally penetrated them with his
penis and finger. He
threatened them and cut them with a knife. Susan was
allegedly involved in these
activities and was seen by the girls hanging upside
down in the shower. Both Susan
and Mark were accused of licking the girls on their
genitals and the couple was said to
have intercourse in front of the girls. These activities
were supposedly photographed.
Eventually, the allegations developed into satanic rituals.
Jessica reported that her
father dressed up in a costume with red ears and a tail
and took the girls to "devil
meetings" where everyone at the meeting was dressed
like devils. The meetings were
in a secret place that was reached by going through
a dark tunnel. Susan was the
"Queen Devil" who led prayers in which people
chanted "We hate Jesus, We hate
Mary, We love the devil." After the ceremonies,
the children were taken to the chain
board room and tied up. There were feasts in which people
ate dead mouse stew
made from mice that were alive until they were chopped
up and put into the stewpot.
Mark was criminally charged. Shortly after this, Janice
alleged that Mark and Susan
had entered her house through an upstairs window and
ritually abused the children
while she was sleeping downstairs. Andrea had become
upset during dinner about
ketchup on her plate and, when questioned, said that
Susan and Mark had awakened
the girls and forced them to drink urine from a paper
cup and blood from a plastic cup.
Mark then blew a white powder up each of their noses
with a straw. After this, Mark
had anal sex with both children. The children were then
taken into the bathroom
where they watched Susan defecate on the floor. Susan
and Mark poured the
remaining urine from the cup into the children's hair
and made the children eat the
feces that were on the floor. Mark and Susan then cleaned
themselves with a pink
towel and left, after threatening the children that
if they told, they and their mother
would be killed. Janice apparently slept peacefully
during the ritualistic activities that
were said to have taken place upstairs.
The police were called and Janice told them that Mark
and Susan were members of a
satanic cult that requires its members to dehumanize
their offspring through sexual
and ritual abuse. The police searched the house and
looked for fingerprints, traces of
feces, blood, urine, and semen but according to the
police report found no physical
evidence of the alleged activities.
The criminal charges against Mark were dismissed when
the prosecutor realized the
weakness of the case because of the bizarre nature of
the allegations and lack of
corroborating evidence. Mark continued his relationship
with Susan and eventually
married her. When the family case came to trial, Mark's
visits were restored.