Nurses' Attitudes Toward the Child Victims and the
Perpetrators of Emotional, Physical, and Sexual Abuse
Ann H. Seidl, Marietta P. Stanton, Adele Pillitteri, Carol Smith,
and Barbara Boehler*
ABSTRACT: Nurses interact with children in a variety of hospital
and community-based settings and are mandatory reporters of emotional,
physical, and sexual child abuse. Little is known about their
comfort in dealing with victims or the abusers. This descriptive study
of 318 registered nurses attending a mandatory class for relicensure on
child abuse examined differences among three types of abuse, ages of the
victims, and the perpetrators. Dependent t-tests revealed that
nurses were significantly less comfortable with sexual abuse, abuse of
infants, and dealing with fathers. Recommendations for educational
curricula and continuing education are made.
Although child abuse is a major and increasing concern in the United
States affecting more than 2.4 million children annually (Clearinghouse
on Child Abuse and Neglect Information, 1989), little is known about
nurses' attitudes about child abuse. Furthermore, even less is
known about nurses' attitudes about child abuse perpetrators. This
situation is somewhat ironic, because nurses are mandated reporters and
are likely to be at the forefront of child abuse identification due to
the broad array of areas in which they practice. Nurses may
encounter child abuse in hospitals, emergency rooms, clinics, primary
care facilities, public health agencies, schools, and camps. Their
attitudes about the victim and the perpetrator are basic to the
interventions they select.
Nursing interventions are generally preventive and
treatment-oriented, based on three goals. At one level, nurses
intervene with high risk families to prevent the child abuse from
occurring. This is called primary prevention. At the next
level of intervention, a nurse recognizes more subtle clues of abuse and
intervenes to prevent further abuse. At the tertiary level, nurses
are involved in providing direct services to children who already have
been emotionally, physically, or sexually abused. Some nurses are
involved in direct interventions with perpetrators, either in counseling
modalities or in group work or parenting classes.
Nursing and Child Abuse
The precise definition of child abuse that is associated with the
state mandate for relicensure is different from that held by various
professionals. Social workers and nurses rate child abuse
incidents as more serious than pediatricians and psychologists (Snyder
& Newberger, 1986). Paradoxically, nurses who had extensive
knowledge regarding child abuse from practice in community health or in
pediatric nursing assigned less seriousness to some situations.
Professionals' attitudes about child discipline are developed from their
various cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds and influence
nurses' perceptions of their own comfort with abuse.
Previous research on nurses' reactions to child abuse has documented
reactions of anger, frustration, denial, and confusion (Chamberlain,
1974; Scharer, 1978; Stanley, 1987). Heindl (1981) described
nurses' interpersonal reactions with children who are abuse victims as
failure to set appropriate limits for the child, exhibition of
extraordinary attention to the child, and even rejection of the child
who failed to respond as the nurse had expected. These reactions,
she explained, are based on nurses' fantasies that they can rescue the
children under their care. Frenken and Stolk (1990) concluded from
interviews with nurses and several other types of professionals that the
health care providers were overwhelmed with feelings of powerlessness,
embarrassment, and disgust, and they had developed a strong
identification with the abused victim. Despite these feelings and
attitudes, Sykes (1987) did not find differences between a nurse's
awareness of child abuse and his or her attitude about the
appropriateness of parent participation in the abused child's hospital
care. Nurses were not found to be more positive toward parent
participation with abused or nonabused children. So, it seems that
nurses continue to support the involvement of parents with their
children and are able to overcome their feelings.
Background
Child Abuse Victims
Child abuse has been described in the Bible and in mythology.
Currently, the incidence is thought to be increasing. This
increase may be a result of expansion of the definition of child abuse
and decreasing acceptance of what had been considered acceptable
child-rearing patterns in the past. It was only a hundred years
ago that the famous Mary Ellen case of 1874 was brought to the attention
of the Court under the auspices of the Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals. That case became the basis for founding the
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Solomon, 1973).
The increase reflected in child abuse statistics may also be a result
of increased reporting, because all states now have mandatory reporting
laws as well as protection from criminal liability for those who report
and penalties for failure to report. A recent survey of all 50
states reported an increase in reports of approximately 10% from 1988 to
1989 (National Center on Child Abuse Research Prevention, 1990).
Child Abuse Perpetrators
Child abuse is considered to be linked to the escalation of both the
number of adolescent parents and the drug crisis. It is known that
about 20% of the births in the United States are to teenagers.
Prior research has indicated that many teenagers are overwhelmed by the
responsibilities of parenting and have unrealistic expectations of their
children. More current research fails to support this deficit
model in all cases of adolescent parenting and is focusing on specifying
the characteristics of those teenage parents at risk of child
abuse. Some states have observed that 90% of the cases of child
abuse are associated with substance abuse by the perpetrator (National
Center on Child Abuse Research Prevention, 1990).
It is well documented that child abusers include members of all
races, religions, and ethnic backgrounds and that, frequently, parents
who abuse children say that they were abused as children
themselves. Furthermore, it is known that abusive parents tend to
be emotionally immature, have poor self-images and be socially
isolated. However, it is less well known that the abuser is more
likely to be the mother in cases of physical abuse and the father or
live-in boyfriend when abuse leads to the death of the child (Stanton,
1990). In situations involving sexual abuse, the victim is more
likely to be female and the molester more likely to be the father,
stepfather, or other male family member. When boys are sexually
abused, however, the perpetrator is not likely to be a family member (Finkelhor
& Baron, 1985).
Characteristics of different types of abuse and professionals'
beliefs and attitudes about children at different ages may contribute to
their relative degree of comfort in dealing with child victims.
For example, infants are generally perceived to be relatively helpless
and vulnerable, needing adults' protection, whereas toddlers are often
perceived as needing discipline. In a similar vein, expectations
about the roles of mothers and fathers as protectors of children, as
compared with other adults, may affect the professional nurse's dealings
with perpetrators of abuse. To explore selected aspects related to
nurses' dealing with abuse situations the following research questions
were generated.
Research Questions
1. |
Are there differences in nurses' perceived abilities to deal
with victims of emotional, physical, and sexual child abuse? |
2. |
Are there differences in nurses' perceived abilities to deal
with emotional, physical, and sexual abuse victims of various
ages infants, toddler, school agers, and adolescents? |
3. |
Are there differences in nurses' perceived abilities to deal
with child abuse perpetrators who are mothers, fathers, or
others? |
4. |
Is there a relationship between specific characteristics of
the nurses, i.e. age, educational level, work area, length of
employment, marital status, and number of children and perceived
abilities to deal with emotional, physical, and sexual abuse? |
Assumptions
It was assumed from reviewing the literature involving the
interrelationship of nursing and the abusive family that nurses'
attitudes toward the family may affect the nursing care that the
patient/victim receives (Gill, 1989; Heap, 1982; Steele, 1975). It
was also assumed that nurses who feel more comfortable dealing with
victims of child abuse and parental abusers may provide better care and
more objective interventions for those families than do nurses who feel
uncomfortable dealing with abusive families. The study also
assumes that some nurses in the sample may have had previous experience
with abusive families either clinically or personally.
Methodology
Design
This study was descriptive in nature and differentiated nurses'
attitudes relating to three types of abuse emotional, physical,
and sexual. It investigated whether attitudes differed in response
to the age of the child. It further examined nurses' attitudes
toward mothers, fathers, and others as perpetrators of abuse and
addressed whether these differences in attitudes related to the age of
the child.
Procedure
Data concerning nurses attitudes were collected at a series of
courses provided by the Continuing Education Department of the School of
Nursing at the State University of New York at Buffalo based on a
curriculum developed by the New York State Education Department.
The two hour course fulfills the requirements of Chapter 544 for all
professional nurses who will apply for license recertification in New
York State in 1992. Data collection took place over a one-year
period. Questionnaires were handed out as nurses entered the
classroom for a mandated course on the identification and reporting of
child abuse and maltreatment. Time was allotted before the
beginning of the class for respondents to fill out and return the
materials.
Sample
Three hundred eighty (380) nurses enrolled in the course. Data
were received from 318 nurses for an 84% return rate. Partially
completed questionnaires were included.
Instrument
The questionnaire was developed by four nursing school faculty
members, all of whom had doctoral degrees and substantial knowledge and
clinical experience in pediatrics and with child abuse. The
questionnaire consisted of four sections and included demographic
questions. Each component of the questionnaire measured different aspects
of child abuse. The component reported here focused on the
demographic characteristics of the nurse sample and a 21-item scale
measuring nurses' attitudes toward child abuse and the abuser.
Questions 1 through 7 specifically related to nurses' perceptions of how
comfortable they would feel when dealing with child victims of emotional
abuse and their abuser; questions 8 through 14 concerned nurses'
attitudes toward physical abuse and abusers; and questions 13 through 21
involved nurses' attitudes toward sexual abuse and abusers. Nurses
were asked to determine their degree of comfort in dealing with a
particular item by using a five-point Likert-type scale with 1
describing definite comfort and 5 indicating no comfort at all.
For example, one question was as follows: "I believe I could
comfortably deal with an emotionally abused child aged 1 year to
12 years" (Answer l-2-3-4-5). The higher the mean, the
greater the discomfort in dealing with various aspects of abuse.
Individual instructions were provided for each section. (See Appendix
A for the questionnaire.)
Data Analysis
Data were coded and checked using standard procedures. Face
validity of the instrument was determined by a panel of nursing
experts. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach's alpha
(a = .95). Descriptive data analysis techniques were used to
evaluate all questionnaire items. In addition, the relationships
between demographic variables and nurses' attitudes were examined by use
of parametric methods of data analysis. The experimental type I
error rate was set at < .05. Using the multiple Bonferoni
approach, the researcher set the first comparison at .05/1 = .05, the
second comparison at .05/2 = .025, and the third comparison at .05/3 =
.016 (Bird, 1975; Ramsey, 1982; Wu & Slakter, 1991).
Results
The mean age of the participants was 45 with a standard deviation
±10 years. The youngest respondent was 24 years old and the
oldest was 76 years of age. The sample was 91% female and 9%
male. Approximately 94% of the sample were registered nurses and
6% were from allied health disciplines. Of the nurses,
approximately 27% were diploma graduates; 16% had associate degree
preparation in nursing; 28% had a baccalaureate degree in nursing; 9%
had master's preparation in nursing; and 20% had received a degree
outside of nursing. Eleven nurse practitioners were involved in
the study. The mean number of years as a nurse was 17 years with a
standard deviation of ±10 years.
Of the nurses who participated, 39% listed
their current or most recent primary work area as medical-surgical; 27%
as pediatrics; 15% as geriatrics; and 15% as psychiatry.
Approximately 28% of the survey respondents were either unemployed,
retired, failed to answer or were from another discipline. Table
1 shows the diversity of work areas of the respondents.
In regard to marital status, the majority of respondents (72%) were
married; 13% were single; and the remainder of the sample was widowed,
separated, or divorced. Respondents had an average of two
children, with 23% of the sample never having had children. The
average age of the oldest child of the respondents was 20 years with a
standard deviation of ±10 years; age of the second child was 19 ±10
years. The gender distribution for the children in each group was:
first child, 56% male; second child, 55% female.
In terms of how participants believed the mandated training would
impact on their future practice, 46% thought it would have an
effect. However, 11% were undecided; and, 43% anticipated no
effect.
A review of nurses' self-reported comfort
levels in dealing with selected types of child abuse (emotional,
physical, or sexual) in relation to the abused child's age indicated
that nurses appear to feel least comfortable dealing with situations
involving sexually abused children, especially infants under one year of
age (see Table 2). Significant differences
were noted between nurses' comfort with sexual abuse and either physical
or emotional abuse. They also indicated more comfort with physical
abuse than with emotional abuse (t = 2.93, p < .05) (See Table
3). For comparison, nurses were also asked to respond to
dealing with these same types of abuse of adults. Similarly,
nurses were significantly less comfortable dealing with sexual abuse
than either physical or emotional abuse of adults (See Table
4) (t = 3.13, p < .05; t -4.62, p <.05). Close perusal
of Tables 3 and 4 suggests that participants were somewhat more
comfortable dealing with adult victims than child victims in all three
abuse categories. The differences were small: 0.23 for emotional abuse,
0.20 for physical abuse, and 0.24 for sexual abuse.
Review of the nurses' self-reports in dealing
with various types of abusers revealed that nurses seem least
comfortable with an abusive father in all types of abusive situations
(see Tables 5, 6, & 7).
Nurses were most comfortable with mothers in emotional and physical
abuse situations and strangers as perpetrators of sexual abuse.
The most difficulty was with the father in a sexually abusive situation
(See Table 5).
Chi-square analyses were performed to determine if there were any
differences between and among groups of nurses in their comfort levels
in dealing with various forms of abuse/abusers based on differences in
the demographic data. Categories were collapsed and categorized as
being "definitely" or "very likely to be able to deal
with," "undecided" or "unlikely would be able"
or "not at all able to deal with" the types of abuse or the
abusers. There were no significant relationships between nurses'
age, length of time being a nurse, marital status, or number of children
and comfort dealing with abuse and child abuse perpetrators.
However, a significant relationship was found between the gender of the
nurse and some aspects of abuse. Male nurses perceived themselves
to be more likely to deal comfortably with emotionally abused teenagers
(Chi-square=5.985, df=2, p<.05), although no gender
differences were noted in the ability to deal with the perpetrator.
Emotional Abuse
Further perusal of Table 2 indicates the
majority (69%) felt they were comfortable dealing with an emotionally
abused adult. Over 50% indicated comfort with an emotionally
abused infant (54%), children aged 1 to 12 (60%), and teenagers aged 13
to 18 years (56%). Although the data are preliminary and the
number is small, a significant relationship (Chi-square=5.985, df=2, p<.05)
between gender of the nurse and the ability to deal with emotionally
abused teenagers was determined. Further, when it comes to
emotional abuse, nurses are significantly more comfortable dealing with
the mother as the perpetrator than the father (t = 5.78, p
<.05) or strangers (t = 2A9, p <.05) (See Table
6).
Physical Abuse
Again, the majority of nurses (71%) perceived themselves to be able
to deal with a physically abused adult (see Table 2).
Over 57% felt they could deal with the physical abuse of an infant under
one year. Almost 70% were comfortable with the physically abused
child from 1 to 12 years (66%), and teenagers 13 to 18 years
(64%). However, 67% were undecided or unlikely to be able to deal
with a perpetrator of physical abuse. The gender of the nurse did
not significantly relate to the nurses' ability to deal with the
perpetrators of physical abuse for various aged children. Nurses
had significantly more difficulty with the father as perpetrator than
with the mother (t =5.40, p <.05) or a stranger (t
= 3.21, p <.05) (See Table 7).
Sexual Abuse
Sixty-five percent of nurses thought they were likely to be able to
deal with a sexually abused adult (see Table 2).
This did not differ by the gender of the nurse. Over half (53%)
were undecided or unable to deal with sexual abuse of an infant,
although 52% were comfortable dealing with sexual abuse of a child from
1 to 12 years, and teenagers. However, 80% were undecided or
unlikely to be able to deal with the sexual abuser, particularly if the
sexual abuser were the father (see Table 5).
Male nurses, when compared to females, were significantly more
comfortable dealing with the sexually abusive mother (Chi-square = 7.67,
df =2, p=.02), and the abusive fathers (Chi-square = 6.32, df =
2, p = .04). In general, when dealing with a sexual abuse
perpetrator, nurses are significantly less comfortable with the father
than with the mother (t =4.60, p <.05) or strangers (t
=5.06, p <.05) (See Table 8).
Summary and Conclusions
Analysis of the data demonstrated that, overall, more than half of
the nurses surveyed felt comfortable dealing with all three types of
abuse and victims of all age groups, but were undecided or unable to
deal with the perpetrators of child abuse. However, nurses were
most comfortable dealing with emotional and physical abuse and least
comfortable with sexual abuse. Significantly, nurses are
uncomfortable with the emotional abuse of infants under one year and
teenagers. Nurses are also uncomfortable dealing with children
under a year and who have been physically or sexually abused.
Nurses were more comfortable dealing with abusive mothers as opposed to
fathers. They were least able to deal with fathers as perpetrators
of sexual abuse.
The results of this study suggest that nurses do not feel comfortable
dealing with child abusers. We recommend that nursing educators
incorporate information about abusers into the curriculum. Nurses
may benefit from continuing education that relates to abused children
under one year old. Although the gender of the nurse may influence
perceptions of the abused and the abuser, this requires further
exploration. The nurses' demographic characteristics do not seem
to be related to perception.
Recommendations of Further Research
The following are research and practice recommendations based on the
findings of this study:
1. |
Replication of the study on selected sample groups. |
2. |
Further reliability and validity testing of the instrment used
in the study. |
3. |
Further exploration of the impact of the gender of the nurse,
personal experiences with abuse, and reactions to types of abuse
and the abuser. |
4. |
Specific investigation into the role of gender of the nurse
and the gender of teenage abuse victim. |
5. |
Other demographic characteristics to explore:
· Religion
· Attitudes toward discipline
· Personal history of abuse
· Nurses as teenage parents
|
6. |
There is a need to further develop the understanding of the
nursing scope of practice with abuse and refine instruments that
explicate the concepts/constructs within interactions with abuse
victims and abusers. |
References
Bird, K. D. (1975). Simultaneous contrast testing procedures for
multivariate experiments. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 10, 343-351.
Chamberlain, N. (1974). The nurse and the abusive parent. Nursing
'74, 4, 72-76.
Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect
Information. (1989). Child
abuse and neglect: A shared community concern. (DHHS Publication No. ADM
22-01016) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
office.
Finkelhor, D., & Baron, L. (1985). Risk factors for childhood sexual
abuse: A review of the evidence. Unpublished report. Family Violence
Research Program, University of New Hampshire.
Frenken, J., & Stolk, B. (1990). Incest victims: Inadequate help
by professionals.
Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 253-263.
Gil, F. T. (1989). Caring for abused children in the emergency
department. Holistic Nurse Practitioner, 4(1), 37--t7.
Heap, K. (1982). Work with parents of abuse and neglected children.
Child Abuse & Neglect, 6, 335-341.
Heindl, M. (1981). Dealing with feelings: Who is the victim? Nursing
Clinics of North America, 16(1), 117-125.
National Center on Child Abuse Prevention Research (1990). Current
trends in child abuse reporting and fatalities: The results of the 1989
annual state survey (Working Paper No. 508). Washington, DC: National
Committee for Prevention of Child Abuse.
Ramsey, P. (1982). Empirical power of procedures for comparing two
groups on p variables. Journal of Educational
Statistics, 7, 139-156.
Scharer, K. (1978). Rescue fantasies: Professional impediments in
working with abused families. American Journal of
Nursing, 78, 1483.
Snyder, J., & Newberger, E. (1986). Consensus and difference
among hospital professionals in evaluating child maltreatment. Violence
and Victims, 1(2), 125-139.
Solomon, T. (1973). History and demography of child abuse. Pediatrics,
51(4), 773-776.
Stanley, S. (1987). Child abuse. Paper presented at National
Association of Orthopedic Nurses Seventh Annual Congress. Baltimore,
Maryland.
Stanton, M. (1990). Our Children Are Dying: Recognizing the
Dangers
and Knowing What to Do (). Buffalo, NY:
Prometheus Books.
Steele, B. F. (1975). Working with abusive parents: A psychologist's
view. Children Today, 16, 2-9.
Sykes, M., Hodges, M., Broome, M., & Threatt, J. (1987). Nurses'
knowledge of child abuse and nurses' attitudes toward parental
participation in the abused child's care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing,
22(6), 412-417.
Wu, Y. B., & Slakter, M. J. (1991). Proceedings of international
educational statistics and measurement symposium. April 18-20, 1991.
Tiainen Teachers College, Taiwan, ROC.
Appendix A - Questionnaire
Table 1
Frequency
Distribution of Work Areas for Child Abuse Training
Participants |
|
Work Area |
n |
% |
|
Hospitals
Primary card
Other Institutions
prisons, schools, nursing homes
Administration, education, consultation
Other
Unemployed, retired
Missing
TOTAL |
74
37
97
44
40
23
3
318 |
23
12
31
14
13
7
1
*101 |
|
*Percentages do not equal one hundred percent
due to rounding. |
|
Table
Level of Comfort
Dealing with Various Types of Abuse by Age of Child
(n=318) |
|
|
|
Percent of Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely &
Very Likely
Could Deal
With |
|
Undecided
As To
Whether
Could Deal
With |
|
Unlikely &
Would Be Un-
able/Not At
All Able To
Deal With |
|
Missing
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
Emotional Abuse of Child Aged: |
<_ 11 months |
|
161 |
54 |
|
76 |
25 |
|
64 |
21 |
|
17 |
5 |
1-12 years old |
|
181 |
60 |
|
67 |
22 |
|
54 |
18 |
|
16 |
5 |
13-18 years old |
|
168 |
56 |
|
84 |
28 |
|
49 |
16 |
|
17 |
5 |
>_ 19-adult |
|
208 |
69 |
|
73 |
24 |
|
21 |
7 |
|
16 |
5 |
Physical Abuse of Child Aged: |
<_ 11 months |
|
169 |
57 |
|
68 |
23 |
|
60 |
20 |
|
21 |
7 |
1-12 years old |
|
194 |
66 |
|
56 |
19 |
|
46 |
16 |
|
22 |
7 |
13-18 years old |
|
188 |
64 |
|
62 |
21 |
|
46 |
16 |
|
22 |
7 |
>_ 19-adult |
|
225 |
71 |
|
55 |
17 |
|
18 |
6 |
|
20 |
6 |
Sexual Abuse of Child Aged: |
<_ 11 months |
|
139 |
47 |
|
79 |
27 |
|
76 |
26 |
|
24 |
8 |
1-12 years old |
|
152 |
52 |
|
71 |
24 |
|
71 |
24 |
|
24 |
8 |
13-18 years old |
|
155 |
52 |
|
75 |
25 |
|
66 |
22 |
|
24 |
8 |
>_ 19-adult |
|
191 |
65 |
|
66 |
23 |
|
38 |
3 |
|
23 |
7 |
|
Table
Comparison of Mean
Levels of Comfort with Three Types of Child Abuse |
|
Type of Abuse |
No. of
Cases |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
2-tail
probability |
Emotional |
309 |
2.41 |
.80 |
2.93 |
.004* |
Physical |
|
2.33 |
.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotional |
308 |
2.41 |
.80 |
4.05 |
.000* |
Sexual |
|
2.58 |
.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical |
308 |
2.33 |
.82 |
6.72 |
.000* |
Sexual |
|
2.58 |
.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental error <_ .05
.05/3 = .016
.05/2 = .025
.05/1 = .05 |
|
Table
Comparison of Mean
Levels of Comfort with Three Types of Abuse - Adults |
|
Type of Abuse |
No. of
Cases |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
2-tail
probability |
Emotional |
308 |
2.18 |
.84 |
1.15 |
.25 |
Physical |
|
2.13 |
.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotional |
305 |
2.18 |
.84 |
3.13 |
.002* |
Sexual |
|
2.34 |
.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical |
306 |
2.13 |
.80 |
4.62 |
.000* |
Sexual |
|
2.34 |
.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental error <_ .05
.05/3 = .016
.05/2 = .025
.05/1 = .05 |
|
Table
Ability of Nurses to
Deal with Various Types of Abusers Performing Various
Types of Abuse (n=318) |
|
|
|
Percent of Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely &
Very Likely
Could Deal
With |
|
Undecided
As To
Whether
Could Deal
With |
|
Unlikely &
Would Be Un-
able/Not At
All Able To
Deal With |
|
Missing
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
|
Emotional Abuse |
Adult other than parent |
|
101 |
34 |
|
108 |
36 |
|
90 |
30 |
|
20 |
6 |
Mother |
|
116 |
39 |
|
95 |
32 |
|
87 |
29 |
|
20 |
6 |
Father |
|
90 |
30 |
|
114 |
38 |
|
94 |
32 |
|
20 |
6 |
Physical Abuse |
Adult other than parent |
|
99 |
34 |
|
111 |
38 |
|
86 |
29 |
|
22 |
7 |
Mother |
|
110 |
37 |
|
99 |
33 |
|
87 |
29 |
|
22 |
7 |
Father |
|
91 |
31 |
|
108 |
37 |
|
96 |
33 |
|
23 |
7 |
Sexual Abuse of Child Aged: |
Adult other than parent |
|
75 |
25 |
|
110 |
37 |
|
110 |
37 |
|
23 |
7 |
Mother |
|
70 |
24 |
|
113 |
38 |
|
112 |
38 |
|
23 |
7 |
Father |
|
59 |
20 |
|
115 |
39 |
|
121 |
41 |
|
23 |
7 |
|
Table
Comparison of Mean
Levels of Comfort with Emotional Child Abusers |
|
Abuser |
No. of
Cases |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
2-tail
probability |
Mother |
309 |
2.87 |
1.02 |
5.78 |
.000* |
Father |
|
3.02 |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mother |
308 |
2.87 |
1.02 |
2.49 |
.013* |
Other |
|
2.95 |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Father |
308 |
3.02 |
1.00 |
2.26 |
.025 |
Other |
|
2.95 |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental error <_ .05
.05/3 = .016
.05/2 = .025
.05/1 = .05 |
|
Table
Comparison of Mean
Levels of Comfort with Physical Child Abusers |
|
Abuser |
No. of
Cases |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
2-tail
probability |
Mother |
306 |
2.90 |
1.08 |
5.40 |
.000* |
Father |
|
3.02 |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mother |
307 |
2.89 |
1.08 |
2.11 |
.035 |
Other |
|
2.94 |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Father |
306 |
3.02 |
1.06 |
3.21 |
.001* |
Other |
|
2.94 |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental error <_ .05
.05/3 = .016
.05/2 = .025
.05/1 = .05 |
|
Table
Comparison of Mean
Levels of Comfort with Sexual Child Abusers |
|
Abuser |
No. of
Cases |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
2-tail
probability |
Mother |
306 |
3.24 |
1.10 |
4.60 |
.00* |
Father |
|
3.32 |
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mother |
305 |
3.24 |
1.11 |
.78 |
.436 |
Other |
|
3.22 |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Father |
305 |
3.32 |
1.08 |
5.06 |
.00* |
Other |
|
3.22 |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental error <_ .05
.05/3 = .016
.05/2 = .025
.05/1 = .05 |
|