Title: |
The Dilemma of American Social Welfare
|
Author: |
William M. Epstein |
Publisher: |
Transaction Publishers, © 1993 |
Transaction Publishers
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 08903
$39.95
"'What we know ...,' an awful gnomic conceit, is actually very
little. This ignorance is painful ... The art of prediction in the
social services has not gone much past Delphi and tout sheets" (p. 202).
This is the basic message of this trenchant and pugnacious 241-page
book. It is a powerful indictment of the failure of social welfare
programs and the devastating failure of science and scientists.
With meticulous attention to standards of accuracy, science, rigor, and
objectivity, Epstein mercilessly exposes the sins and moral turpitude of
scientists, particularly mental health professionals, who shape their
conclusions and interpretations to fit the ephemeral political and
social consensus of the moment and maintain their privileged and
comfortable niche. His basic theme is that the American population
is unwilling to pay the dollar costs of actually solving social
problems, and scientists and science are prostituted to maintain the
myth that cheap, simple interventions work to solve them. But
there is no credible scientific evidence to show that any social program
has worked to solve any social problem.
"The conflict between the resources needed to address contemporary social
problems in the United States and the political unwillingness to come up with
those resources defines the current dilemma of American Social policy; solutions
for social problems exist in principle but they are not politically feasible"
(p. 7). If accurate, a footnote (p. 15) contains a staggering and sobering
estimate: "the human services probably account for more than one trillion
dollars annually and employ the largest portion of the American work force."
A huge portion of our total economy is expended in ventures that do not work.
This gargantuan folly is supported, justified and maintained by the
pseudoscience foisted upon the public by mainly psychology and social work and
also the other social sciences.
Chapters 1 and 2 are the most powerful in the book. First, the
standards of proof in social science research are briefly but clearly set forth.
Then the research in psychotherapy, which Epstein states has been a "pillar of
social care and of training for the emergent professions of the welfare
state-social work, counseling, psychology) and even, home economics" (p. 14), is
subjected to those standards. Epstein's judgment is that there is no
evidence that psychotherapy works but its central place in the society is
maintained by the collusion of scientists in "the pursuit of 'clinical' as
opposed to social solutions" (p. 42). The criticism of the outcome
research and meta analysis in psychotherapy is a model for the critical thinking
necessary to assess the quality of research and the interpretations given to it.
The wonder is that "psychotherapy and the many extensions of clinical psychology
have enjoyed a prolonged popularity ... without offering any credible proof of
an ability to modify dysfunctional personal behavior" (p. 60).
The remainder of the book includes an analysis of social services and a
cogent and meticulous criticism of the research said to support programs for
negative income transfer, jobs training, juvenile delinquency, and drug
addiction. The pattern is the same. Scientists, wittingly or
unwittingly, continue to claim there is scientific support for programs when
there is none that meets the standards of scientific proof and rigor. The
book contains extensive references and ends with a short index.
In the confusion that surrounds policies and procedures responding to
allegations of child abuse, Epstein's powerful critique of social policy and
social science is directly transferable. Everything he writes about the
practice of pseudoscience, the collusion of a tainted community of scholars, and
the corruption of the social policy process by the falsehoods of scientists
succumbing to pressures to conform to accepted myths can be said about the
research and the use of it in child abuse. Scientists, psychotherapists,
particularly clinical psychologists, should read this book and hang their heads.
"Quacks, charlatans, and psychotherapists may have much in common (p.57).
Attorneys and judges should carefully study this book and use it to sort out
pseudoscience from accurate scientific knowledge when it is presented in the
courtroom. Attorneys, especially defense attorneys, should know and
understand the critiques of this book in order to effectively determine trial
strategy, plan the cross-examination of experts, and know when to object and
what objection to make.
Prosecutors who are genuinely interested in justice rather than winning cases
should read this book carefully and absorb the criticism of pseudoscience.
Understanding the basic principles in evaluating research is crucial in order to
make the best decisions when to charge an offense and what allegations should be
dismissed. At this point, the few research studies prosecutors use to
support the use of the anatomically-detailed dolls, to buttress child witnesses,
and to bolster allegations with behavioral indicators are subject to these
criticisms. It does no good for anything, including the future career of
prosecutors, to prosecute persons on the basis of falsified and erroneous
pseudoscience.
Judges, particularly those who make decisions about admissibility of
purported scientific evidence following the U.S. Supreme Court Daubert
decision, must be familiar with Epstein's analysis of science and scientific
facts. Many judges are simply not prepared, not knowledgeable enough, to
make that level of decision properly.
Also, judges who make decisions regarding disposition and treatment of people
must know this critique of the social welfare services and programs. In
several instances Epstein clarifies the actual research data to show that it
indicates the programs often used as treatments by judges actually harm people
and exacerbate an already disastrous situation. It is clear that a casual
choice to get rid of a knotty problem, clear a court calendar, or avoid a tough
or controversial decision, by shifting responsibility to the mental health
professions or social welfare or child protection personnel cannot be made with
impunity or confidence that it is either a wise or right decision.
There are no promises of easy solutions in this book. The social
problems which are addressed by social welfare are intractable. The
warning throughout the presentation of this sobering view is that no matter what
is done it is going to be far more costly than anyone is willing to admit or
accept. Politicians who make the laws and appropriate the funds for social
service programs should not vote on any social service legislation until after
they have read this book.
I highly recommend this book.
Reviewed by Ralph Underwager, Institute for Psychological
Therapies, Northfield, Minnesota.