| Title: | Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Settings  | 
    
      | Editor: | J. Amos Hatch | 
    
      | Publisher: | Praeger Publishers, © 1995 | 
  
 
         Praeger 
        Publishers
        88 Post Road West
        P. O. Box 5007
        Westport, CT 06881-5007
        (203) 226-3571
        $65 (c); $22.95 (p)
        Qualitative research is being presented as an alternative to the 
        quantitative research methodology that has dominated social science's 
        research field for several generations of researchers.  This book 
        represents a serious attempt to present the challenge of qualitative 
        methods to change and redirect the understanding and the research being 
        done in places where young children are found, i.e., day care, 
        preschool, and educational institutions.  The editor claims the authors 
        are expressing "avant garde thinking."  The book has two basic parts: 
        studies and methods, ethics and theory.  There are 13 chapters; six are 
        qualitative studies and seven are essays that defend, clarify, and 
        explain qualitative research.  There are 256 pages including a moderately 
        useful but limited index and brief descriptions of the authors of the 
        chapters.
The primary interest of the book is its focus on the emotional experience of 
young children in the settings studied.  The fundamental proposition is that our 
existence is relational and social.  Therefore the context of emotional 
experience is necessary to understand.  The method favored is the participant 
observer involved in the contexts of the emotional experiences.
The book is of interest for the observations of children in their daily 
settings but it fails to consider the evidence suggesting that emotion is 
determined by our cognitions.  The meaning ascribed to experience depends upon 
the cognitive capacities of the individual.  Qualitative research may provide 
material for hypotheses to be developed but then quantitative research is the 
only way known to ascertain what role subjective experience may have had in 
producing bias and error in the observations.
        Reviewed by Ralph Underwager, Institute for 
        Psychological Therapies. 
        