Endnotes

1

NATIONAL CENTER ON CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, Study Findings: Study of National Incidence and Prevalence of Child Abuse and Neglect (Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, n 3, at 7 (1988)).  [Back]

2

See, John E. B. Myers, Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Litigation, 68 NEB. L. REV. 1 (1989).  [Back]

3

Gail S. Goodman & Alison Clarke-Stewart, Suggestibility in Children's Testimony: Implications for Sexual Abuse Investigations, in the SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S RECOLLECTIONS, IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY (Paperback) 92 (John Doris ed., 1991).  [Back]

4

Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 836 (1990).  The court's analysis of using closed-circuit television considered the importance of balancing rights of accused to confront witnesses while simultaneously protecting children from the trauma of face-to-face confrontation.  [Back]

5

State v. Michaels, 642 A.2d 1372 (N.J., 1994).  [Back]

6

Id.  [Back]

7

FED. R. EVID. 601. "Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules."  [Back]

8

FED. R. EVID. 602. "A witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter.  Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the witness' own testimony.  This rule is subject to the provisions of rule 703, relating to opinion testimony by expert witnesses."  [Back]

9

FED. R. EVID. 603. "Before testifying, every witness shall be required to declare that the witness will testify truthfully, by oath or affirmation administered in a form calculated to awaken the witness' conscience and impress the witness' mind with the duty to do so."  [Back]

10

FED. IL EVID. 607; "The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness."  [Back]

11

See, Jean P. Piaget, THE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT OF THE CHILD (Library Binding) (1926).  The basic developmental stages of a child are articulated by psychologist Piaget in this classic work.  [Back]

12

Josephine Bulkley, Symposium on Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: The Current State of the Art, Law Reforms in the Mid-1980s, 40 U. MIAMI L. REV. 5, 6 (1985).  [Back]

13

Id.  [Back]

14

See, John E. B. Myers, 1990 Survey of Books Relating to the Law v. Law and Society, 88 MICH. L. REV. 1709 (1990).  [Back]

15

See, Veronica Serrato, Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: A Spectrum of Uses, 68 B.U. L REV. 155 (1988).  [Back]

16

Amicus Brief for the Case of NJ v. Michaels, State v. Michaels, 625 A.2d 489 (1993) Maggie Bruck & Stephen J. Ceci, Presented by the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists, 44-46 (undated).  [Back]

17

Diana Younts, Evaluating and Admitting Expert Opinion Testimony in Child Sex Abuse Prosecutions, 41 DUKE L. J. 691(1991).  [Back]

18

Younts, supra note 17, at 694-95.  [Back]

19

Younts, supra note 17, at 697.  [Back]

20

Richard A. Gardner, TRUE AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS OF CHILD SEX ABUSE (Currently Out of Print) 121 (1992).  [Back]

21

Gordon J. Blush & Karol L. Ross, Sexual Allegations in Divorce: The SAID Syndrome, CONCILIATION CTS. REV. 1,6 (1987).  [Back]

22

Debra Whitcomb, National Institute of Justice, When the Victim is a Child 111 (1992).  [Back]

23

Serrato, supra note 15, at 156.  [Back]

24

Id.  [Back]

25

Id.  [Back]

26

Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 (1990).  [Back]

27

Younts, supra note 17, at 691.  [Back]

28

Wright, 497 U.S. at 805.  [Back]

29

Id. at 809.  [Back]

30

Id.  [Back]

31

Id.  [Back]

32

Id.  [Back]

33

Id.  [Back]

34

Id.  [Back]

35

Id.  [Back]

36

Id.  [Back]

37

Id. "After the judge conducted a voir dire examination of the child, he asked both counsel if they agreed that she was not capable of communicating to the jury and both agreed she was not competent to testify."  There is no further explanation of why she was not competent to testify.  [Back]

38

Wright, 497 U.S. at 809.  [Back]

39

Id.  [Back]

40

FED. IL EVID. 803(24). "A statement not specifically covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines that (A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purpose of these rules and the interest of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence."  [Back]

41

Wright, 497 U.S. at 812.  [Back]

42

Id. at 817.  [Back]

43

Id.  [Back]

44

Id.  [Back]

45

Thomas L. Feher, The Alleged Molestation Victim, the Rules of Evidence, and the Constitution; Should Children Really be Seen and Not Heard?, 14 AM. J. CRIM. L. 227, 250 (1987).  The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment guarantees the defendant the right to effective cross-examination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment.  [Back]

46

Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980).  [Back]

47

Id. at 65.  [Back]

48

Id. at 66.  [Back]

49

Id. at 65.  [Back]

50

Id.  [Back]

51

Wright, 497 U.S. at 815..  [Back]

52

Wright, 497 U.S. at 823..  [Back]

53

Id. at 813..  [Back]

54

Id.  [Back]

55

Wright, 497 U.S. at 818, (citing Idaho v. Wright P.2d at 1230 (1989)).  [Back]

56

Id.  [Back]

57

Id.  [Back]

58

Id. at 819.  [Back]

59

Id. at 806.  [Back]

60

Younts, supra note 17, at 704 (quoting Wright, 110 5. Ct. at 3150).  [Back]

61

White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 (1992).  [Back]

62

White, 502 U.S. at 356.  The evidentiary theory for allowing hearsay testimony under the spontaneous declaration or medical care exceptions relates to their being seen as carrying certain guarantees of trustworthiness.  This is because these are typically statements which are made in situations that if false or misleading, would be detrimental to persons involved.  [Back]

63

Younts, supra note 17, at 702.  [Back]

64

Jean Montoya, Something Not So Funny Happened on the Way to Conviction: The Pretrial Interrogation of Child Witnesses, 35 ARIZ. L. REV. 927, 980 (1993).  [Back]

65

Id.  [Back]

66 Id.  [Back]
67

Id. at 981.  [Back]

68

Id.  [Back]

69

Wright, 497 U.S. at 821-22.  [Back]

70

Younts, supra note 17, at 737-38.  [Back]

71

Commonwealth v. Johnson, 631 N.E.2d. 1002, 1004 (1994).  [Back]

72

Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1014-15(1988).  [Back]

73

John R. Christiansen, The Testimony of Child Witnesses: Fact, Fantasy, and the Influence of Pretrial Interviews, 62 WASH. L. REV. 705, 707 (1987).  [Back]

74

See generally, THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S RECOLLECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY (Paperback) (John Doris, ed., 1991) for discussions on psychological, behavioral, and social data on the suggestibility of children.  [Back]

75

Christiansen, supra note 73, at 721.  [Back]

76

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1376.  [Back]

77

Id.  [Back]

78

See generally, Victims of Child Abuse Act, 1990.  [Back]

79

Whitcomb, supra note 22, at 55.  [Back]

80

Id. at 56.  [Back]

81

Wheeler v. United States, 159 U.S. 523(1895).  [Back]

82

Id.  [Back]

83

Gary Melton, Josephine Bulkley, & D. Wulkan, Competency of Children as witnesses. CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND THE LAW 127 (Josephine Bulkley, ed., 1981). National Legal Resource Center for the Child Advocacy and Protection, Washington, D.C.  [Back]

84

Susan Seahorn, Child Sex Abuse, THE CHAMPION, Apr.1995, at 27.  [Back]

85

Wallace J. Mlyniec & Michelle M. Dally, See No Evil? Can Insulation of Child Sexual Abuse Victims be Accomplished Without Endangering the Defendant's Constitutional Rights? 40 U. MIAMI L. REV. 115, 122 (1985).  [Back]

86

Maryland v. Craig 497 U.S. 836(1990).  [Back]

87

Id. at 836.  [Back]

88

Craig, 497 U.S. at 856 (quoting Maryland State S. 9-102 (a)(1)(ii)).  [Back]

89

Craig, 497 U.S. at 838.  [Back]

90

Louis Kiefer, Confrontation Clause Revisited: Supreme Court Decisions Idaho v. Wright and Craig v. Maryland, An Attorney's Response ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 164, 166(1990).  [Back]

91

Id.  [Back]

92

Mlyniec, supra note 85, at 126.  [Back]

93

Bruck & Ceci, supra note 16, at 14-15.  [Back]

94

See generally, THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S RECOLLECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY (Paperback) (John Doris, ed.,1991).  [Back]

95

See, Stephen J. Ceci & Maggie Bruck, JEOPARDY IN THE COURTROOM: A SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN'S TESTIMONY (Hardcover) Chapters 8-11 (1995).  [Back]

96

Bruck & Ceci, supra note 16, at 1.  [Back]

97

Gardner, supra note 20, at 351.  Gardner defines leading questions as "refer[ring] to questions that engender in the mind of the listener specific visual image that is not likely to have been produced had the question not been asked."  [Back]

98

Kee MacFarlane & Sandra Krebs, Techniques for Interviewing and Evidence Gathering, in Kee MacFarlane and J. Waterman, et al. SEXUAL ABUSE OF YOUNG CHILDREN (Paperback (1988))(Paperback (1995)), n. 15 at 87. (1986).  [Back]

99

John E. B. Myers, Amici Curiae Brief of American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children et al. at 15-16, Idaho v. Wright 110 5. Ct 3139 (1990).  [Back]

100

Younts, supra note 17, at 721.  [Back]

101

Richard A. Gardner, Leading Stimuli, Leading Gestures, and Leading Questions, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 148 (1992).  [Back]

102

Lawrence W. Daly, Who Evaluates Child Interviews and Interviewers? ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS, at 5 (1992) (citing American Academy of Pediatrics. (February, 1991) Guidelines for the evaluation of sexual abuse of children. PEDIATRICS, 87(2)).  [Back]

103

Id. at 6 (citing the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (Modified December 14, 1990). Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of child and adolescent sexual abuse).  [Back]

104

Hollida Wakefield & Ralph Underwager, ACCUSATIONS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE (Hardcover)(Paperback) 30 (1988).  [Back]

105

Gail S. Goodman & Vicki S. Helgeson, Child Sexual Assault: Children's Memory and the Law, 40 U. MIAMI L. REV. 181, 198-199 (1985).  [Back]

106

Id. at 198.  [Back]

107

Id.  [Back]

108

Christiansen, supra note 73, at 712.  [Back]

109

Elizabeth Loftus & Katherine Ketcham, WITNESS FOR THE DEFENSE (Hardcover)(Paperback) 17 (1991).  [Back]

110

Maira S. Zaragoza, Preschool Children,, Susceptibility to Memory Impairment, in THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S RECOLLECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY (Paperback) 28 (John Doris, ed., 1991).  [Back]

111

Bruck & Ceci, supra note 16, at 16.  [Back]

112

Hollida Wakefield & Ralph Underwager, Techniques for Interviewing Children in Sexual Abuse Cases, VOCAL PERSPECTIVE, 7-15 (1989).  [Back]

113

Charles Brainerd & Peter Ornstein, Children's Memory for Witnessed Events: The Developmental Backdrop, in THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN'S RECOLLECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY (Paperback) 14 (John Doris, ed., 1991).  [Back]

114

Lawrence W. Daly, Child Sexual Abuse Allegations: Investigative Approaches and Identifying Alternative Hypotheses, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 125, 125 (1992).  [Back]

115

Ceci & Bruck, supra note 95, at 296.  [Back]

116

Bruck & Ceci, supra note 16, at 2.  [Back]

117

Id. at 44.  [Back]

118

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1380.  [Back]

119

Id.  [Back]

120

Id. at 1374.  [Back]

121

Id.  [Back]

122

Id.  [Back]

123

Id.  [Back]

124

Id.  [Back]

125

Id.  [Back]

126

Id.  [Back]

127

Id.  [Back]

128

Id.  [Back]

129

Id.  [Back]

130

Id.  [Back]

131

Id. at 1375.  [Back]

132

Id.  [Back]

133

Id.  [Back]

134

Id.  [Back]

135

Id.  [Back]

136

Id.  [Back]

137

Id.  [Back]

138

Id.  [Back]

139

Id.  [Back]

140

Id.  [Back]

141

Id.  [Back]

142

Id.  [Back]

143

Id.  [Back]

144

Id.  [Back]

145

Id.  [Back]

146

Id.  [Back]

147

State v. Michaels, 625 A.2d 489, 515 (N.J., 1993).  [Back]

148

The State ultimately decided not to retry the case.  [Back]

149

Michaels, 625 A.2d at 510-18.  [Back]

150

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1385.  [Back]

151

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1383 (citing Watkins v. Sowders, 449 U.S. 341, 350 (1981)).  [Back]

152

Id.  [Back]

153

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1384.  [Back]

154

Lana H. Schwartzman, Survey of Recent Developments in New Jersey Law, 25 SETON HALL L. REV. 453, 463 (1994).  [Back]

155

Michaels, 642 A. 2d at 1383 (citing State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 432 A.2d 86 (1981)).  [Back]

156

Id.  [Back]

157 

Ralph Underwager & Hollida Wakefield, Psychological Evaluation You Need for Trial: What They Can and Cannot Do, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 30, 41(1995).  [Back]

158

Id.  [Back]

159

Michaels, 642 A. 2d at 1382-1383 (citing Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968)).  [Back]

160

Id. at 1383.  [Back]

161

Id.  [Back]

162

Manson v. Braithwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977).  [Back]

163

Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964).  [Back]

164

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1380-1381.  [Back]

165

In this case an undercover state trooper and an informant purchased narcotics from an alleged drug dealer.  The officer knocked on the door of the apartment and asked to make a purchase from the alleged drug dealer.  The officer paid him in exchange for drugs.  The officer and informant returned to police headquarters where the officer described the alleged drug dealer to two other officers.  One of the officers suspected the identity of the drug dealer and obtained his picture and left it in the investigating trooper's office.  Two days later upon his return to the office, the officer viewed the single photo.  The defendant argued this process was unduly suggestive and as a result violated his due process rights.  The Court held that even though the technique was suggestive, that under the totality of the circumstances, the procedure did not violate the Due Process clause under the Fourteenth Amendment because the identification process itself still had sufficient components of reliability. [Manson, 432 U.S. at 99].  [Back]

166

Manson, 432 U.S. at 114.  [Back]

167

Michaels, 642 A.2d at 1382 (citing from United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 230 (1967)).  [Back]

168

Id. at 1382.  [Back]

169

Denno, 378 U.S. at 368 (1964).  In this case the petitioner argued his confession was involuntary because it was taken shortly after being admitted to the hospital suffering from bullet wounds to the liver and lung and while under the influence of drugs.  The Court agreed with him.  [Back]

170

Id.  [Back]

171

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).  [Back]

172

Thomas J. Mack, Scientific Testimony After Daubert: Some Early Returns from Lower Courts, TRIAL, August, 1994 at 23.  [Back]

173

See, New Hampshire v. Hungerford, 94-S-045 through 94-S-047, and New Hampshire v. John Morahan, 93-S-1734 through 93-S-1936 (May 23, 1995) (Hillsborough County Super. Ct.).  [Back]

174

Frye V. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C.Cir. 1923).  [Back]

175

Daubert, 113 S. Ct. at 2795.  [Back]

176

Id.  [Back]

177

Id. at 2796.  [Back]

178

Demosthenes Lorandos & Terence W. Campbell, Myths and Realities of Sexual Abuse Evaluation and Diagnosis: A Call for Judicial Guidelines, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 1, 12(1995).  [Back]

179

Daubert, 113 S.Ct. at 2796, (citing Green, Expert Witnesses and Sufficiency of Evidence in Toxic Substances Litigation: The Legacy of Agent Orange and Benediction Litigation, 86 NW. U. L. REV. 643 (1992).  [Back]

180

Id.  [Back]

181

Id.  [Back]

182

Terence W. Campbell, The Daubert Decision and Its Effects on Expert Testimony, MICH. LAWYERS WEEKLY, Sept.,1993 at 5B.  [Back]

183

Daubert, 113 S.Ct. at 2797.  [Back]

184

Frye, 293 F. at 1014.  [Back]

185

Campbell, supra note 182, at 5B.  [Back]

186

Daubert, 113 S.Ct. at 2795.  [Back]

187

Lorandos & Campbell, supra note 178, at 13.  [Back]

188

Ralph Underwager & Hollida Wakefield, A Paradigm Shift for Expert Witnesses, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 156, 157 (1993).  [Back]

189

See Huber, P. GALILEO'S REVENGE: JUNK SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM (Paperback), New York: Basic Books, 1991.  [Back]

190

Schwartzman, supra note 154[Back]

191

Myers, supra note 14, at 1709.  [Back]

192

Michaels, 642A 2d 1375.  [Back]

193

Editor's note (Hollida Wakefield), After the McMartin Trial: Some Reflections from the Buckeys, ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 220, 220 (1990).  [Back]

194

N. Carolina v. Robert Fulton Kelly, Jr., W1254558 (May 2, 1995).  [Back]

195

Christopher B. Daly, Day Care and Sex Abuse: An Appeal Reopens Wounds, Renews Debate, WASH. POST, May 30, 1995, at A3.  [Back]

196

Myers, supra note 2, at 1711.  [Back]

197

Feher, supra note 45, at 229 (citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974)).  [Back]

198

Younts, supra note 17, at 705.  [Back]

199

John Earl, The Dark Truth about the "Dark Tunnels of McMartin," ISSUES IN CHILD ABUSE ACCUSATIONS 76, 77 (1995).  [Back]

200

Ceci & Bruck, supra note 95, at 162.  [Back]

201

Younts, supra note 17, at 706.  [Back]

202

Id. at 692.  [Back]

203

Id.  [Back]

204

See Lorandos, Demosthenes, "Finding the Right Expert," in Expert Witnesses: Beyond Junk Science and Daubert, I.C.L.E, (Ann Arbor, 1995).  [Back]

205

Schwartzman, supra note 154[Back]

206

Jennifer Allen, The Danger Years, LIFE, July, 1995 at 45.  [Back]

207

David, P. Elder, Investigation and Prosecution of Child Sexual Abuse Cases, 19 WEST. ST. U. L. REV. 249,249(1991).  [Back]

208

Seahorn, supra note 84, at 28.  [Back]

[Back to Article]

 
Copyright © 1989-2014 by the Institute for Psychological Therapies.
This website last revised on April 15, 2014.
Found a non-working link?  Please notify the Webmaster.