The Trial Verdicts
The McMartin jury never learned about Judy Johnson's emotional problems,
but it had two-and-one-half years to look at all the best evidence that the
prosecution could present, including the taped interviews and court testimony
of nine child witnesses who testified they had been abused, over 1,000 pieces
of evidence, and the testimony of 143 other witnesses.56
First Trial Verdict
On January 18, 1990 the jury handed down verdicts in favor of the
defense. Seven of the 12 jurors voted for acquittal on all counts
against both defendants.57
Peggy McMartin Buckey, accused of molesting four children, was acquitted
of all 13 counts remaining against her. Her son Ray, accused of
molesting 14 children, was acquitted on 39 of 52 counts with the jury
voting overwhelmingly for acquittal on the remaining 13 counts.58
Five jurors reportedly believed that none of the
children had been molested. The seven others thought some children had
been molested but they were unable to reach a consensus about how much
molestation had occurred or who could have caused it. They had little
confidence in the prosecution's evidence or the way the case had been
investigated. "Even if you accept that the children were
molested," one juror commented, "they [the prosecution] didn't
show they were molested at the McMartin preschool."59
It was wrong, the jury said, for the Manhattan Beach
Police Department to send out a letter to 200 McMartin parents that suggested
their children may have been molested and that parents should question their
children. The result was rampant gossip and cross-germination of stories. The
jurors saved their harshest criticisms for the CII child interviews, saying that
they were "leading, suggestive and worthless" as incriminating
evidence.60
Some jurors said that the children's accounts were contradictory or
logistically impossible. Prosecutors' far-fetched attempts to paint defendant
Ray Buckey as a pedophile with evidence that he read Playboy magazine and
didn't always wear underwear went unheeded by jurors.
Nor were they convinced by the
"corroborative" testimony of a career criminal and
professional "jail house snitch" (a known perjurer and murder
suspect) who was placed in Ray Buckey's jail cell and became a star
witness for the prosecution. Weeks of testimony about animal remains and
the search by parents and the District Attorney's hired archaeologists
for the alleged underground tunnels were also unpersuasive.61
First Trial Aftermath
Reiner was now entangled in a campaign to become the Democratic Party's
nominee for attorney general of California. The McMartin case,
tightening like a noose around his political neck, needed to be deftly
handled and discarded if possible. But Reiner was unable to balance
conflicting moral and political demands to his advantage. On one hand,
the jury had spoken and the two defendants who had already spent years
in jail without chance of bail deserved to go free.62
On the other hand, McMartin parents and a chorus of local politicians
were pressuring Reiner to retry Buckey on the remaining 13 deadlocked
counts.
Within two weeks after the verdicts were read, parents
and their allies began an intensive campaign for a retrial. They appeared in the
national news media and on television talk shows repeating claims of molestation
and satanic rituals.63 Bob
Currie boasted that he had new evidence that would help convict the defendants.
At two news conferences he failed to live up to a promise to unveil hundreds of
police reports; instead, he read allegations supposedly made by his own son
who was not a complaining witness in the case, and presented a mother who said
her child had been molested at a church across the street from the preschool.64
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors bowed
to pressure from the parents and agreed to demand an investigation of
the McMartin case by the state Attorney General's office if Reiner did
not retry Ray Buckey.65
Reiner announced that Buckey would be retried on 8 of the 13 remaining
counts all involving three girls who had testified at the first
trial. A new prosecution team led by Joseph Martinez was assigned and 5
more counts against Ray Buckey were dropped.
Martinez announced that the new trial would be more
concise and better focused than the first, but there would be no new evidence to
work with other than the supposed ability of the children to remember better
this time around.66 Except
for the discovery of a "smoking gun," however, there was virtually no
chance that a second jury would convict Ray Buckey.67
Second Trial Verdict
The trial was perfunctory and its final outcome on the remaining charges
was almost identical to the outcome of the first trial. On July 27, the
second jury announced that it was hung on all counts, again favoring
acquittals by a substantial vote margin.68
The judge ruled a mistrial and the jurors began to answer reporters'
questions. The second jury's concerns about the evidence echoed the
concerns of the first jury.