References

APA Council of Representatives (1991, February 8). Statement on the use of anatomically detailed dolls in forensic evaluations. Washington: DC: American Psychological Association.

Bays, J. (1990). Are the genitalia of anatomical dolls distorted? Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 171-175.

Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1995). An introduction to the cognitive interview technique. In T. Ney (Ed.), True and False Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse: Assessment and Case Management () (pp. 192-206.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Bellak, L., & Bellak, S. S. (1980). A Manual for the Children's Apperception Test (7th ed.). Larchmont, NY: C.P.S., Inc.

Bersoff, D. N. (1995). Ethical conflicts in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1988). Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 171-179.

Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Concerning practices of interviewers using dolls in child protective services investigations. Child Maltreatment, 1, 96-104.

Boat, B. W., Everson, M. D., & Holland, J. (1990). Maternal perceptions of nonabused young children's behaviors after the exposure to anatomical dolls. Child Welfare, 69, 389-400.

Bottoms, B. L., Shaver, P. R., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). An analysis of ritualistic and religion-related child abuse allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 1-34.

Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Michaels presented by committee of concerned social scientists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 272-322.

Burgess, A. W., McCausland, M. P., & Wolbert, W. A. (1981). Children's drawings as indicators of sexual trauma. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 19(2), 50-58.

Campbell, T. W. (1992a). False allegations of sexual abuse and the persuasiveness of play therapy. Issues in Child Abuse Accusations, 4, 118-124.

Campbell, T. W. (1992b). Promoting play therapy: Marketing dream or empirical nightmare? Issues in Child Abuse Accusations, 4, 111-117.

Cantlay, L. (1996). Detecting Child Abuse: Recognizing Children at Risk Through Drawings (). Santa Barbara: Holly Press.

Caruso, K. R. (1990). Projective Story Telling Cards. Redding, CA: Northwest Psychological Publishers, Inc.

Ceci, S. J. (1994). Cognitive and social factors in children's testimony. In B. D. Sales & G. R. VandenBos (Eds.), Psychology in Litigation and Legislation () (pp. 11-54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.

Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony (). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304-320.

Coleman, L. (1986, Jan-Feb). False allegations of child sexual abuse: Have the experts been caught with their pants down. Forum, pp. 12-20.

Conte, J. R., Sorenson, E., Fogarty, L., & Rosa, J. D. (1991). Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: Results from a survey of professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 428-437.

Cundick, B. P. (1989). Review of the Kinetic Drawing system for Family and School: A Handbook. In O. K. Buros, The Tenth Mental Measurements Yearbook ()() (pp. 422-423). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth (). New York: The Free Press.

Dawson, B., & Geddie, L. (1991, August). Low income, minority preschoolers' behavior with sexually anatomically detailed dolls. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association in San Francisco, CA.

Dawson, B., Vaughan, A. R., & Wagner, W. G. (1992). Normal responses to sexually anatomically detailed dolls. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 135-152.

DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols: The model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109-113.

DeLoache, J. S. (1995). The use of dolls in interviewing young children. In M.S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C.N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath, Improving Children's Testimony (pp. 160-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Di Leo, J. H. (1973). Children's Drawings as Diagnostic Aids (). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Di Leo, J. H. (1996). Young Children and Their Drawings (). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Dumont, F., & Smith, D. (1996). Projectives and their infirm research base. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 419-421.

Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1990). Sexualized doll play among young children: Implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 736-742.

Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1994). Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 113-129.

Faller, K. C, (1984). Is the child victim of sexual abuse telling the truth? Child Abuse & Neglect, 8, 473-481.

Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 732-764.

Fisher, C. B., & Whiting, K. A. (in press). How valid are child sexual abuse validations? In S. J. Ceci & H. Hembrooke (Eds.), What Can (and Should) an Expert Tell the Court (). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Fisher, R. P., & McCauley, M. R. (1995). Improving eyewitness testimony with the cognitive interview. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Applied Psychology, Individual, Social, and Community Issues: Vol. 1. Memory and Testimony in the Child Witness ()() (pp. 141-159). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gabriel, R. (1985). Anatomically correct dolls in the diagnosis of sexual abuse of children. The Journal of the Melanie Klein Society, 3(2), 40-51.

Gardner, H., & Wolf, D. (1987). The symbolic products of early childhood. In D. Görlitz & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Curiosity, Imagination, and Play: On the Development of Spontaneous Cognitive and Motivational Processes () (pp. 305-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Gardner, R. A. (1988). The Storytelling Card Game. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.

Glaser, D., & Collins, C. (1989). The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 547-560.

Goodman G. S. (1984). Children's testimony in historical perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 40(2), 9-31.

Goodwin, J. (1982). Use of drawings on evaluating children who may be incest victims. Children and Youth Service Review, 4, 269-278.

Harris, D. B. (1972). Review of the Draw-A-Person. In O. K. Buros, The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook () (pp. 401-404). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

Handler, L. (1996). The clinical use of drawings: Draw-A-Person, House-Tree-Person, and Kinetic Family Drawings. In C. S. Newmark (Ed.), Major Psychological Assessment Instruments () (pp. 206-293). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hibbard, R., Roghmann, K., & Hoekelman, R. (1987). Genitalia in children's drawings: An association with sexual abuse. Pediatrics, 79(1), 129-137.

Hindman, J. (1985). A Very Touching Book For Little People and for Big People (). Durkee, OR: McClure-Hindman Associates. Ontario, OR: AlexAndria Associates

Humphrey, H. J., III, (1985, February). Report on Scott County Investigations. Office of the Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota, Author.

Kelley, S. (1984). The use of art therapy with sexually abused children. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 22(12), 12-18.

Kelley, S. (1985). Drawings: Critical communications for sexually abused children. Pediatric Nursing, 11, 421-426.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (1992). Beyond anatomical dolls: Professionals' use of other play therapy techniques. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 139-142.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A., & Watson, M. W. (1992). Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 423-428.

Koocher, G. P., Goodman, G. S., White, C. S., Friedrich, W. N., Sivan, A. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 199-222.

Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological Evaluation of Children's Human Figure Drawings ()(). New York: Grune & Stratton.

Krivacska, J. J. (1990). Designing Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: Current Approaches and a Proposal For the Prevention, Reduction, and Identification of Sexual Misuse (). Springfield, IL, C. C. Thomas.

Levy, H. B., Markovic, J., Kalinowski, M. N., Ahart, S., & Torres, H. (1995). Child sexual abuse interviews: The use of anatomic dolls and the reliability of information. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 334-353.

McIver, W. F. (1986). The case for a therapeutic interview in situations of alleged sexual molestation. Champion, 10(1), 11-13.

McIver, W., Wakefield, H., & Underwager, R. (1989). Behavior of abused and non-abused children in interviews with anatomically-correct dolls. Issues in Child Abuse Accusations, 1 1(1), 39-48.

Miller, T. W., Veltkamp, L. J., & Janson, D. (1987). Projective measures in the clinical evaluation of sexually abused children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 18(1), 47-57.

Morgan, M. K. (1984). My Feelings (). Eugene, Oregon: Equal Justice Consultants & Education Products (P.O. Box 5582).

Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual (). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Myers, D. V. (1978). Toward an objective evaluation procedure of the Kinetic Family Drawings (KFD): An Interpretive Manual. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 358-365.

Nathan, D., & Snedeker, M. (1995). Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt (). New York: Basic Books.

Nelson, C. S. (1985). A Very Special Person. Grand Junction, CO: Pyramid Printing.

Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. M. (1994, April). Children's eyewitness-memory research: Implications for practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, pp. 204-216.

Rape and Crisis Abuse Center (1985). Red Flag Green Flag People (). Fargo, ND: Red Flag Green Flag Resources.

Rawls, J. M. (1996). How questions and body parts diagrams could effect the content of young children's disclosures. Law Talk, 452, 28-29.

Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik (). Bern: Bircher (Trans. Hans Huber Verlag, 1942).

Ryan, R. M. (1985). Thematic Apperception Test. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland, Test Critiques: Volume II () (pp.799-814). Kansas City, MO: Westport Publishers, Inc.

Sahd, D. (1980). Psychological assessment of sexually abusing families and treatment implications. In W. Holder (Ed.), Sexual Abuse of Children () (pp. 71-86). Englewood, CO: The American Humane Association.

Sanford, D. (1990). Don't Make Me Go Back Mommy (). Portland, OR: Multnomah Press.

Saywitz, K. J., Geiselman, R. E., & Bornstein, G. K. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 744-756.

Simkins, L., & Renier, A. (1996). An analytical review of the empirical literature on children's play with anatomically detailed dolls. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5(1), 21-45.

Skinner, L. J., & Berry, K. K. (1993). Anatomically detailed dolls and the evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: Psychometric considerations. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 399-421.

Slade, A., & Wolf, D. P. (1994). Children at Play: Clinical and Developmental Approaches to Meaning and Representation (). New York: Oxford University Press.

Smith, D., & Dumont, F. (1995). A cautionary study: Unwarranted interpretations of the draw-a-person test. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 298-303.

Summit, R., & Kryso, J. (1978). Sexual abuse of children: A clinical spectrum. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 237-251.

Underwager, R. & Wakefield, H. (1989). Response by Ralph Underwager, Ph.D. & Hollida Wakefield, M.A. in the matter of the proposed adoption of the rule amendments of the Minnesota Board of Psychology governing licensure and professional conduct.

Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1990). The Real World of Child Interrogations (). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1995). Special problems with sexual abuse cases. In J. Ziskin, Coping With Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony, Fifth Edition (). (pp. 1315-1370). Venice, CA: Law and Psychology Press.

Underwager, R., Wakefield, H., Legrand, R., Bartz, C. S., & Erickson, J. (1986, August). The role of the psychologist in the assessment of cases of alleged sexual abuse of children. Presented at the 94th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Wachter, O. (1983). No More Secrets For Me (). Little, Brown and Company.

Wakefield, H., & Underwager, R. (1988). Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse ()(). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Wakefield, H. & Underwager, R. (1989). Evaluating the child witness in sexual abuse cases: Interview or inquisition? American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7(3), 43-69.

Wakefield, H., & Underwager, R. (1993). Misuse of psychological tests in forensic settings: Some horrible examples. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 11(1), 55-75.

Wakefield, H., & Underwager, R. (1994). The alleged child victim and real victims. In J. J. Krivacska & J. Money (Eds.). Handbook of Forensic Sexology () (pp. 223-264). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

Warren, A. R., Woodall, C. E., Hunt, J. S., Perry, N. W. (1996). "It sounds good in theory, but": Do investigative interviewers follow guidelines based on memory research? Child Maltreatment, 1, 231-245.

Weinberg, R. A. (1989). Review of the Kinetic Drawing system for Family and School: A Handbook. In O. K. Buros, The Tenth Mental Measurements Yearbook ()() (pp. 423-425). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

Weisz, J. R., & Weiss, B. (1993). Effects of Psychotherapy With Children and Adolescents () (). Newbury Park: Sage.

Wolfner, G., Faust, D., & Dawes, R. M. (1993). The use of anatomically detailed dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: The state of the science. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 2, 1-11.

Yates, A., Beutler, L., & Crago, M. (1985). Drawings by child victims of incest. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 183-189.

Yates, A., & Terr, L. C. (1988). Debate Forum: Anatomically correct dolls: Should they be used as a basis for expert testimony. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(2), 254-257.